Saturday, June 25, 2011

brenda song oscars

images Sorkin praises Brenda Song brenda song oscars. Brenda Song At The Teen Choice
  • Brenda Song At The Teen Choice


    • indrachat_75
    05-25 11:03 PM
    This is simply great.

    Indra



    wallpaper Brenda Song At The Teen Choice brenda song oscars. Actress Brenda Song arrives at
  • Actress Brenda Song arrives at


    • sayantan76
    07-21 08:51 AM
    Normally my wife is the one who is used to post or follow up on the latest here.

    This came up a week ago. I have been working from home in a different state and we do not have any company office near my home. Nearest office location is about 3 hours. I had to move this far away due to personal reasons.

    Now after working from home for 3 years (extending EAD, H1Bs etc) Fragomen (most of you know who they are) says I cannot do work from home anymore due to this conflict with uscis. it seems USCIS doesnt recognize your home as a Govt recognized work location. Hence I cannot work from home.

    Now my manager wants me to only work from the office since folks reporting to me are also in that state. Now he is using Fragomen and HR emails as a reason for me to move back.

    Anythoughts ? I am sure you all will agree that is the law. but why all this now ? even after working for 12 years.

    One other point the fragomen lawyer said is - this is going to be the case for all thier clients.
    wow - thats a new one.......and really intriguing........one could argue that if a work can be done remotely - then why should the work be located in United States at all and hence - why the need for a visa? on the other hand - that would be totally counterproductive as companies would use the logic to outsource work outside the country and result in reduction in number of employees who pay US taxes.......



    brenda song oscars. Brenda Song.
  • Brenda Song.


    • chanduv23
    07-05 12:50 PM
    Anti immigrants alerted politicians that giving EAD will flood job market and they must do something to stop this.

    Politicians do not want to lose votes in election - so they place orders to agencies to do thiss. Agencies though it is unethical must listen to politicians. Thats why they take the shot.



    2011 Actress Brenda Song arrives at brenda song oscars. renda song 2011.
  • renda song 2011.


    • lecter
    March 26th, 2004, 10:44 PM
    I have just joined this forum and collected my D70 last night. Used for the first time tonight took about 200 photo's with my SB-80DX flash.
    I had to use camera on A or S priority with flash set on Auto. Quite a backward step after TTL metering with the F100.
    The only Nikon flashes which provide full interaction with the D70 are the SB-800 & SB-600. Only these provide auto zoom head function, ISO from camera and TTL metering.
    Hope this helps.PM

    how do you like it?
    Meet and Greet Event in DC. [Archive] - Immigration Voice
    Log in

    View Full Version : Meet and Greet Event in DC.



    more...

    brenda song oscars. (Brenda Song Picture 2)
  • (Brenda Song Picture 2)


    • LostInGCProcess
    11-06 02:54 PM
    If I renew my H1B can I avoid visa stamping by using the AP travel document.
    You can use AP to travel and still be on H status, provided you are working for the same employer.

    I still intend to use my H1B as long as I stay with my current employer, but If I want to change employers or take a different job EAD would be the way to go, in that case would my H1B be invalidated?
    Yes. However, you can ask the new employer to sponsor you H1b and avoid using EAD.

    I am concerned if I use EAD for a future job and 485 gets into trouble can I fall back to my H1B easily?
    Its better to maintain H1 status till you get the GC.



    brenda song oscars. Brenda Song.
  • Brenda Song.


    • bipin
    03-18 02:45 AM
    I worked with a desi consulting company Since Aug 2006. I moved to that company with my current project with the promise of faster GC process. My PERM was approved in Nov 2007, so missed July 2007 filing. I had to leave for India for few months due to an urgent personal issue and came back in April 2008. So I didn't work for 5 months (Nov 2007 - Apr 2008). When I came back he couldn't find any project for me and I realized he was a small company (The company was in NJ and I'm in CA). I found a job on my own in May 2008 and since I realized I'll be in trouble with him again I moved to another consulting company. Since he didn't pay me for 5 months and to prevent me from complaining against him, he said he'll take care of I-140. He said there was an RFE in Mar 2008 and he responded back. He told me it was on my W2 and I asked attorney and he also confirmed it. I didn’t get a copy of I-140 receipt, but I got the receipt number when it was applied.

    And he cancelled my H1 in Aug 2008, though it was valid until Sep 2008. I asked him about this and he said, it's Ok now since I transferred the H1 and he'll not withdraw the I-140. Since I could successfully transfer my H1 w/o paychecks, I decided to leave those behind and move on with my life.

    I applied my PERM with this new company in May 2009 and it's not yet approved. In Sep 2009 I saw my I-140 was approved with my previous employer and I called him and he never responded back. Then I saw his website also went away. Looks like he closed the shop.

    Now in Feb 2010 I saw my I-140 status as withdrawn. This is the worst thing he could do and I'm mad! This is my 8th year in US and I used my I-140 number to extend the H1 and now it's due in Apr 2010 and I don't have a valid I-140 number (my PERM was applied with the new company in May 2009) and it's short of 20 days for 365 days past, I'm in BIG trouble!

    I was taking care of all immigration expenses (H1 Fee, H1 & I-140 Attorney Fee). He made free $$$ from me for 15 months. But he was smart enough not to leave any proof that I paid for these expenses!

    So I've two issues now to take care of.

    - To extend my Visa
    - And to sue my ex-employer for screwing my life. Since It's one year past since my H1 validity with him (H1 was valid until Aug 2008) Can I complain against him to get those 5 months bench salary or the statutory limit is over?

    PLEASE HELP.

    The timeline for you to help me.
    On Bench with ex-employer Nov 2007 - April 2008 (5 months)
    H1 transferred to new company in May 2008
    H1 was valid until Sep 2008 with ex-employer, cancelled it in Aug 2008


    more...

    brenda song oscars. Brenda Song
  • Brenda Song


    • sargon
    07-12 03:48 PM
    May be you should not keep two spouses. Sounds kinda risky.

    Just kidding. The title of the thread goaded me into making a wisecrack.



    2010 Brenda Song. brenda song oscars. Sorkin praises Brenda Song
  • Sorkin praises Brenda Song


    • gc_bulgaria
    10-09 04:18 PM
    http://www.immigration-law.com/

    10/08/2007: I-140 Portability After 180 Days of 485 Filing and Service Centers Standard Procedure of Review and Adjudication


    When there is a retrogression of visa numbers and anticipated long delays in 485 adjudication due to the massive July VB fiasco 485 filings, it is anticipated that there will be a substantial number of 485 applicants who may have to change employment along the way, either voluntarily or involuntarily, under AC 21 Section 106(c) provision. Accordingly, whether one reports the change of employment proactively or not, one should learn the internal review and adjudication procedures within the Service Center which are adopted by the adjudicators in adjudicating such I-485 applications.
    The good material to review on this procedure is the USCIS Standard Operating Procedure for the adjudicators. The SOP states that "If the alien is using the portability provisions of AC21 106(c), the adjudicator must determine that both the ported labor certification and the ported I-140 are still valid under the current employer, especially in regards to the continual payment of the prevailing wage, similar occupation classification, and the employer’s ability to pay the prevailing wage."

    (1) Prevailing Wage Payment: The AC 21 106(c) does not specifically require that the new employer pays the prevailing wage or higher wage for portability. However, the adjudicators review the wage as part of their determination of "continuing validity" of the ported certified labor certification application and I-140 petition. When the applicant stays with the same employer without changing employer, payment of wage less than the prevailing wage should not present any serious issue inasmuch as the employer establishes that the employer was financially able to pay the prevailing wage and is continuously able to pay the prevailing wage until the green card is approved. However, when there is a change of employer who pays less than the prevailing wage, there is no clear-cut rule with reference to this issue. Payment of less than prevailing wage thus potentially can raise two issues when there is a change of employer. One is the adjudicator's argument that there is no continuing validity of the labor certification or I-140 petition. The other is the argument that different wage reflects that the labor certification job and the new job with the new employer are two different occupational classifications.

    (2) Similar occupational classification issue: The similarity of the two positions involves not the "jobs" but "occupational classification." Accordingly, the old and new positions do not necessarily have to match exactly in every details, especially specific skill sets. Currently, the USCIS is looking up the Labor Department SOC/OES classifications of occupations. When the two jobs fall under the same occupational classification in the DOL occupational definitions, the two jobs are generally considered "similar" occupational classification. As long as the two jobs belong to a similar occupational classification, the applicant can work for the new employer anywhere in the United States. There is no physical location restrictions.

    (3) Employer's financial ability to pay the wage: Again, AC 21 106(c) does not specifically require that the new employer must prove that the new employer has and will have a financial ability to pay the prevailing wage. However, the adjudicators appear to review the portability case considering the new employer's ability to pay as well as part of review of continuing vality of labor certification and I-140 petition.
    Remember that when there is a portability issue, two things can ensue. If one proactively reports the eligibility of portability meeting all the foregoing requirment, the adjudicators are likely to decide the pending I-485 application on the merit. However, if the 485 applicants do not report proactively change of employment and the USCIS somehow obtains information of the alien's change of employment, for instance, by employer's report of termination of employment or withdrawal of I-140 petition or substitution of alien beneficiary, then 485 applicants are likely to be served a notice of intent to deny I-485 applications or in most cases, the adjudicator transfers the I-485 file to the local district office for interview.

    In AC 21 106(c) portability situation, the adjudicators also review the issue of the continuing validity of labor certification and I-140 petition involving the original employer, and are likely to raise similar issues which are described above. However, when the alien ports with the "approved" I-140 petition with a copy of the last paycheck and W-2, the adjudicators rarely revisit the original employer's foregoing issues in determining the 140 portability issue. The issues are raised when the alien ports before the I-140 petition is approved. Under the Yates Memorandum, when the alien ports before I-140 petition is approved, the alien has a burden of proof that the I-140 petition was approvable. Accordingly, inasmuch as I-140 petition was approvable and the alien ports after 180 days of I-485 filing, even if the original employer withdraws the I-140 petition, the pending I-485 will not be affected. Yates Memorandum indicates that in such a circumstance, the adjudicator should adjudicate the pending I-140 petition and if finds approvable, then recognizes 106(c) portability and continues to adjudicate the pending I-485 application. Without doubt, in the foregoing situation, the adjudicator will intensively and carefully review the issue of continuing validity of labor certification and I-140 petition issues which are specified above, particularly the employer's financial ability to pay the wage, and the applicant will have to overcome tremendous hurdles to deal with the challenges by the USCIS. Accordingly, people should not port before I-140 petition is approved unless they are assured that the original employer will continuously cooperate and support his/her green card process.


    more...

    brenda song oscars. renda song doesnt have
  • renda song doesnt have


    • morchu
    04-21 08:46 AM
    Depends on many variables.

    1. What is the field of your / your spouse's job? Can you find a good job in Canada?
    2. Is there any other variables that force you to be in USA. (Relatives etc..)?

    For a lot of middle category jobs Canada is even better than USA. Infact Canada is more industrial than USA and has very good quality of life. But if you are going to Canada for a "hi-tech" job, think twice..... (opportunities)..

    "7 years" for US citizenship is tooo optimistic.
    If you are from India, it "may" take 10 years for you to get even a Green Card, filed under EB3. Browse through the forums and you will see than many of the Indians here are waiting for more than 10 years.

    -Morchu

    well, that really sucks, I was not aware of the 180day rule. Many thanks for the information.

    So I have no other option than start all over again. One question, can I apply directly to a new LC or PERM or I need to go thru H1B first?

    My Plan B is Canada, already have Canadian Permanent Resident Card, I need to enter before May 2010....I might need to decide between just moving to Canada and in 3 years get citizenship Vs. Starting new PERM process in USA .....I will be aprox 7 years away from citizenship.


    Any thoughts??



    hair renda song 2011. brenda song oscars. long black hair hairstyles.
  • long black hair hairstyles.


    • gc_bucs
    03-18 10:18 AM
    You & your wife should talk to a good attorney about the possibility of using "interfiling" in case of a divorce. I was in the same situation as you couple of years ago & Shiela Murthy's office recommended "interfiling". If you need more information send me a PM
    Need your opinion on this.. filed for I-485 on EB2 in July 07. I am the primary applicant. I have been married since May '04. Need to apply for a divorce. My wife, a derivative in my application, is holding up the process as it may affect her chances of getting a GC without any sweat. She has an parallel GC process running solely in her name, which I believe hasnt cleared PERM yet (some sort of audit). She is on H1B, extendable for another 3 years, and has EAD from my GC application. Will there be any implications on her application if the divorce goes through? And also, can I out of spite do anything to get her derivative application out of the queue :rolleyes: ?


    more...

    brenda song oscars. Every time I see Brenda Song
  • Every time I see Brenda Song


    • dollar500
    08-02 11:27 PM
    The American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act (Title I of Pub. L. 106 - 313 enacted on October 17, 2000) contained several provisions intended to increase the availability of Employment-based numbers. Pub. L. 106-313 recaptured those Employment-based numbers that were available but not used in Fiscal Years 1999 and 2000, creating a �pool� of 130,107 numbers which could be allocated to applicants in the Employment First, Second, and Third preference categories once the annual Employment-based numerical limit has been reached. Approximately 101,000 of these �pool� numbers remain available for use during FY-1005. Pub. L. 106-313 also removed the per-country limit in any calendar quarter in which overall applicant demand for Employment-based visa numbers is less than the total of such numbers available.

    Changes in CIS processing procedures during the past two years created a significant backlog of cases and a consequent reduction in demand for numbers.
    During the time that the Employment-based categories have remained �Current� many tens of thousands of applicants have become eligible to file for adjustment of status. Last summer, CIS notified Congress of its intent to eliminate its current backlogs by the end of FY-2006. As a result of the CIS backlog reduction effort, we are now experiencing very heavy visa demand as CIS has begun to process cases to conclusion. Section 201(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act states that not more than 27 percent of the Employment-based annual limit may be used in each of the first three quarters of a fiscal year. Based on the current rate of demand, the 27 percent level for the first quarter of FY-2005 will be exceeded by the end of December.

    It has therefore become necessary to impose an Employment-based Third preference cut-off date for January in order to limit number use during the second quarter. Many of the cases have priority dates that are several years old, and the cut-off date represents the first priority date that cannot be accommodated for final processing. The cut-off date will apply only to the following chargeability areas: China-mainland born, India, and Philippines. Cut-off date movement during the remainder of FY-2005 depends on the extent of future visa demand. No specific predictions are possible at this time.



    hot (Brenda Song Picture 2) brenda song oscars. renda song weremar Time
  • renda song weremar Time


    • sparky_jones
    03-12 09:34 PM
    Received a mail for myself and my wife. welcome to USA. But no email from CRIS.
    :):):):):):)

    Congratulations!


    more...

    house Nick#39;s Most Personal Song Yet! brenda song oscars. girlfriend mark zuckerberg and
  • girlfriend mark zuckerberg and


    • niklshah
    01-29 07:26 PM
    Is that your new year wish? :)

    I do not see any possibility unless some miracle happens.


    i see pappu more after IV's new web makeover ....i think he likes blue color more....:p

    jk take it easy...



    tattoo Brenda Song. brenda song oscars. Brenda Song Is The
  • Brenda Song Is The


    • designserve
    02-06 05:19 PM
    Ask him to go to hell!!!

    Pls go on and join wherever you like and tell him this is a free country like India.Go to a lawyer and sue him if he talks any further...Not to worry,my friend.


    more...

    pictures Brenda Song brenda song oscars. Happy Birthday Brenda Song!
  • Happy Birthday Brenda Song!


    • nandakumar
    03-06 09:41 PM
    Faxed



    dresses renda song weremar Time brenda song oscars. Brenda Song (22)
  • Brenda Song (22)


    • omved
    10-09 01:43 AM
    There are lots of people living in arizona on H1 visa but still not member in immigrationvoice yet...

    But sure, lets do meet sometime...


    more...

    makeup renda song doesnt have brenda song oscars. Nick#39;s Most Personal Song Yet!
  • Nick#39;s Most Personal Song Yet!


    • madhu345
    03-14 07:09 AM
    From my experince you can earn referral fees but you have to file your taxes for that amount, send me PM if you need any further details.

    -Madhu
    I hope someone out there in a similar situation can help me out.
    I have given my real estate agent several referrals and for each I receive a cash amount. I'm on an H1B visa, am I able to receive income from someone other than my employer?
    I've searched the web and have been able to find out that this should be reported as taxable income, I'm just not sure if I can receive it due to my immigration status.
    Any comments or tips are welcome.



    girlfriend Brenda Song Is The brenda song oscars. view the renda song along
  • view the renda song along


    • Aah_GC
    07-21 11:16 AM
    Hi there - thanks for posting this. Am in the same boat as you were. Do you by any chance have that fax number?



    hairstyles Every time I see Brenda Song brenda song oscars. also stars Brenda Song.
  • also stars Brenda Song.


    • eilsoe
    10-03 01:37 PM
    OR... more... :evil:



    cool_desi_gc
    08-22 12:48 PM
    Paper filed to TSC and my 485 is pending at NSC
    PD: EB3 Dec 2002

    EAD sent to TSC on July 10th
    RD: Jul 11th
    ND: Jul13th

    EAD expiring on Oct 3rd.So my countdown started.

    This is scary man...



    kaisersose
    10-12 10:29 AM
    You should also consider the GC factor. If your L employer is willing to sponsor a GC, then that is terrific.

    You can come into the US in Jan 2008 on L-1A, apply for your 140/485 in Feb 2008 (labor is not required for EB1 and the PDs are current) and you should have your GC by Jan 2009.

    On the other hand, if you come here on a H visa, you may not have a GC even during 2019!

    Weigh your options and plan accordingly.


    Posted by Edalene at 8:44 AM

    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)